<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Text Messaging Synchronous?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewferrier.com/blog/2006/07/20/is-text-messaging-synchronous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewferrier.com/blog/2006/07/20/is-text-messaging-synchronous/</link>
	<description>Economics; Travel; Film; and Technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferrier&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sexual Synchronicity Economics</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewferrier.com/blog/2006/07/20/is-text-messaging-synchronous/comment-page-1/#comment-5686</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferrier&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sexual Synchronicity Economics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new-destiny.co.uk/andrew/blog/2006/07/20/is-text-messaging-synchronous/#comment-5686</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve written about synchronicity vs. asynchronicity before, but I wanted to revisit the subject because it seems to be so key to modern services; as more and more communication mechanisms evolve out of available technology and entrepreneurs&#8217; imagination, understanding customer&#8217;s usage patterns will be important when developing businesses around them. An excellent article by Gregor Hohpe, Starbucks Does Not Use Two-Phase Commit (included in Joel Spolsky&#8217;s Best Software Writing Vol. 1), is an examination of why understanding computer science concepts such as 2PC (and, I would argue, synchronicity) is important when engaging in business process engineering. There&#8217;s a large overlap between business and software engineering here, and this is why IBM sells products like WebSphere Process Server together with business consultants to help customers implement them. There are a number of other essays in Spolsky&#8217;s excellent book which also discuss related subjects. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve written about synchronicity vs. asynchronicity before, but I wanted to revisit the subject because it seems to be so key to modern services; as more and more communication mechanisms evolve out of available technology and entrepreneurs&#8217; imagination, understanding customer&#8217;s usage patterns will be important when developing businesses around them. An excellent article by Gregor Hohpe, Starbucks Does Not Use Two-Phase Commit (included in Joel Spolsky&#8217;s Best Software Writing Vol. 1), is an examination of why understanding computer science concepts such as 2PC (and, I would argue, synchronicity) is important when engaging in business process engineering. There&#8217;s a large overlap between business and software engineering here, and this is why IBM sells products like WebSphere Process Server together with business consultants to help customers implement them. There are a number of other essays in Spolsky&#8217;s excellent book which also discuss related subjects. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
