<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewferrier.com/blog/2006/10/02/ray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewferrier.com/blog/2006/10/02/ray/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ray</link>
	<description>Economics; Travel; Film; and Technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:31:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferrier</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewferrier.com/blog/2006/10/02/ray/comment-page-1/#comment-1808</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new-destiny.co.uk/andrew/blog/2006/10/02/ray/#comment-1808</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. I think it&#039;s the job of a biopic to get you interested in the character, and I like you, I didn&#039;t know a lot about Ray Charles before I started watching the film, and ended up with a better understanding of him. So in that respect it was good. I don&#039;t think it was as impressive as some more intense films such as Nixon, but maybe that&#039;s just my preference. Anyway, I would agree that Jamie Foxx&#039;s performance was strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. I think it&#8217;s the job of a biopic to get you interested in the character, and I like you, I didn&#8217;t know a lot about Ray Charles before I started watching the film, and ended up with a better understanding of him. So in that respect it was good. I don&#8217;t think it was as impressive as some more intense films such as Nixon, but maybe that&#8217;s just my preference. Anyway, I would agree that Jamie Foxx&#8217;s performance was strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tomkins</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewferrier.com/blog/2006/10/02/ray/comment-page-1/#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tomkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.new-destiny.co.uk/andrew/blog/2006/10/02/ray/#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>Think I&#039;d have to disagree with you a bit on this. I wasn&#039;t particularly interested in Ray Charles before seeing this but thoroughly enjoyed this film. Jamie Foxx&#039;s portrayal or Ray Charles is superb and well deserving of the Oscar he won (he insisted on doing almost everything with his eyes closed in order to ensure he came across as being blind). Unfortunately Jamie (like a number of good actors) seems to have taken several less challenging roles in subsequent films - stick with the good stuff Jamie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think I&#8217;d have to disagree with you a bit on this. I wasn&#8217;t particularly interested in Ray Charles before seeing this but thoroughly enjoyed this film. Jamie Foxx&#8217;s portrayal or Ray Charles is superb and well deserving of the Oscar he won (he insisted on doing almost everything with his eyes closed in order to ensure he came across as being blind). Unfortunately Jamie (like a number of good actors) seems to have taken several less challenging roles in subsequent films &#8211; stick with the good stuff Jamie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

